Regarding Roger’s talk on Dingle

[greenscience9000]

Regarding Roger’s talk on Dingle.

Here is my discussion with AI about Dingle and Relativity’s terminology.
(Expires in 7 days)

https://search.brave.com/ask?q=Dingle+Paradox+for+Relativity&conversation=092571ff2ea8c690da82c0f5a52e7d171576#RxIO0h2qx30jfif1uFBxYhHTmIeur3v-HsweK0pAZ1k

[greenscience9000]

Underdetermination in relativity

Conversation with Brave AI reconstruction via Deepseek AI: # Dingle Paradox for Relativity – Cleaned Conversation ## User: Dingle Paradox for Relativity **Brave AI:** The Dingle Paradox (or Dingle’s Clock Paradox) was an argument advanced by British astrophysicist Herbert Dingle (1890–1978) claiming Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity (STR) is logically self-contradictory. ### Core argument Two clocks in relative motion each see the other as slower → “If A works more slowly than B, then…

[Roger]

Yeah usually summarised as Dingle did not understand relativity. Unfortunately, there seem people in CNPS spearheaded by Nicholas Percival who don’t understand relativity in the same way, and so their attack on relativity is ill-informed.