In I’m not sure what year, maybe around 1850 to 1900 more or less? it was kind of gradual honestly, they/we started to notice the what is usually called the “galactic rotation problem”, where we saw that, plain and simple, simply using gravity against the observed galaxies just make them instantly explode rather than staying stable, which doesn’t make much sense, so then in dunno around 1915 to 1940 I think? started to be talked the idea of dark matter, and shortly following that anti matter, and the two kinda even got mixed honestly… the thing is, if you have ever modeled those ideas yourself like I have, you notice that it doesn’t even come close to explain the dynamics of galaxies, instead, some MOND researchers are into the right path, they still are very confused but they have a idea that is correct, or well at very least I’m very confident that it is, an attraction following a scaling of 1 / distance instead of 1 / distance ^ 2, after this idea I modeled the galactic force, an additional fundamental force defined by A x M x M / D, A is the constant of this force which has a value of around 10^-26, the 2 Ms are the masses like gravity, and D is the distance, that perfectly explains models and fits perfectly the dynamics of galaxies, specially the milky way which is the galaxy that we have the best data on for obvious reasons, so I just wanted to ask if any of you have figured that out and what you think about it.
First GR and SR are postulate. Dark matter is the apparent missing mass. Now if you treat the vacuum as a medium that contain a strain “equivalent” to the observable mass you can roughly solve this rotational speed problem. Yes MOND makes better accountability of galactic mass, they fail miserably in other regards… You can spin this into AI it will understand the Wilczak symmetry explain dark matter. (you can disregard the CMB part in the paper it’s a placeholder.) ZEUS-CORE framework
I LITERALLY have no clue what I even read, I didn’t understand a single word, it doesn’t even seem like english, I am literally as confused as any entity can ever be in this universe, I have absolutely no clue how to even respond to that… mr strain “equivalent” Wilczak symmetry…
Well just use AI to ask questions, you start a thread asking question while it would have been a 2 min search to find out this problem was discovered by Vera Rubben. Anyways, understanding these problems take dedications. It’s not a book or a few articles after a youtube video that will clarify everything for you. In short you can says than under Newtonian or Einsteinian gravity the rotational speed/mass relation cannot be explained, things would fly apart. Keep in mind they cannot even explain the 3-body problem.
It took me from the moment I started learning science and learned about the real newtonian physics that really govern our universe and learned that everything einstein said was nonsense, from that point, 2 years, until I learned about the existence of MOND, form there I just grabbed the idea of the 1 / distance scaling out of everything they said, because MOND researchers don’t have it figured out, then I grabbed that 1 / distance concept and tested and fabricated the formula until I had it working, and once I saw it actually worked and that it worked well and exactly what with what formula then and only then I searched for exactly the result I already had, I already had the answers and I was just searching if someone else had it, and after searching then and only then I found 1, 1 single researcher that had figured it out, that wasn’t popular at all and I only found it because I knew exactly what I was looking for because I already had the answers myself. And after that I also tried to tell AI about it and it didn’t understand shit and it was awful at understanding it, it took me a lot of work only to make the AI sort of understand the idea because it is brainwashed with mainstream shit.
not a single thing of all that is “just use AI to ask questions, it would have been a 2 min search to find”
so I literally don’t know what the fununis you are talking about but it seems like we don’t exist in the same reality.
”It’s not a book or a few articles after a youtube video” what are you talking about? literally what are you saying? are you making stuff up? what book? what youtube video? I didn’t watch any of that, I made the research and the modeling and the science myself, it took me years of work that nobody else did, or well almost nobody, can you stop putting weird things on my mouth?
”will clarify everything for you” you need to have things clarified to you, not the other way around dude.
”In short you can says than under Newtonian or Einsteinian gravity the rotational speed/mass relation cannot be explained, things would fly apart.” you realize that that is what I said myself right?! did you even read what I said before you posted your nonsense?!
”Keep in mind they cannot even explain the 3-body problem.” and this is where you literally look like a troll…
Sure. Where is you model? 
Godspeed.
ok rude asshole, first you spew a lot of unrelated nonsense, then you claim stupid shit about AI and how easy my work is to find or something is to find, I don’t even know what you were saying there, then you make up some weird shit about a book or a youtube video I supposedly watched or fucking something because you just make shit up, then you repeat what I said myself like if you didn’t even read me the first time, then you say some troll sounding shit like “Keep in mind they cannot even explain the 3-body problem” which is as moronic as things go, and now, when you finally could just ask normally like a normal fucking person about what my model for the galactic force is, when I’m literally the only one using this useless forum because everyone here seems retarded, you fucking “ Godspeed” me, well you can put your fucking “ Godspeed” and shove it in your ass, you can try to apologize and ask nicely and I might explain it well, but you don’t deserve anymore from me right now.